AMD Radeon RX 560D vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560D and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 941 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1175 MHz vs 967 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
Launch date | 4 July 2017 vs 12 March 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 941 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1175 MHz vs 967 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
- Around 65% higher texture fill rate: 108.3 GTexel / s vs 65.8 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 896
- Around 23% better floating-point performance: 2,599 gflops vs 2,106 gflops
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 108.3 GTexel / s vs 65.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 896 |
Floating-point performance | 2,599 gflops vs 2,106 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560D
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 560D | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3353 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3450 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 276 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12598 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.836 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 960.114 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.038 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.57 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.753 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6350 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6350 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1336 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 560D | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Polaris 21 | GK104 |
Launch date | 4 July 2017 | 12 March 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | |
Place in performance rating | 740 | 743 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1175 MHz | 967 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 941 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,106 gflops | 2,599 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 1344 |
Texture fill rate | 65.8 GTexel / s | 108.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 170 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 120.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |