AMD Radeon RX 560D vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560D and NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560D
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 732 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 235 Watt
- Around 15% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5200 MHz
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 1032
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 1032
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 July 2017 vs 12 November 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 732 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 235 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 5200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 1032 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 1032 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 164.0 GTexel / s vs 65.8 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 2688 vs 896
- Around 87% better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 2,106 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7038 vs 3350
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7038 vs 3350
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 164.0 GTexel / s vs 65.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2688 vs 896 |
Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops vs 2,106 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7038 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7038 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560D
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 560D | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 1032 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 1032 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 7038 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 7038 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4403 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 198 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16664 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.455 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1666.354 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.836 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 92.472 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 275.229 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 560D | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Polaris 21 | GK110 |
Launch date | 4 July 2017 | 12 November 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | $7,699 |
Place in performance rating | 743 | 746 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1175 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 732 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,106 gflops | 3,935 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 2688 |
Texture fill rate | 65.8 GTexel / s | 164.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 235 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 7,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 170 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 249.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |