AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 750x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 8 GB/s
Launch date | 11 April 2018 vs 10 June 2016 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 8 GB/s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1175 MHz
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1275 MHz
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 202.0 GTexel / s vs 81.6 GTexel / s
- Around 88% higher pipelines: 1920 vs 1024
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 6,463 gflops vs 2,611 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 846 vs 676
- 7.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13504 vs 1810
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47366 vs 17898
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1175 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1275 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 202.0 GTexel / s vs 81.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1920 vs 1024 |
Floating-point performance | 6,463 gflops vs 2,611 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 846 vs 676 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13504 vs 1810 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47366 vs 17898 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 | 846 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1810 | 13504 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17898 | 47366 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6066 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Baffin | GP104 |
Launch date | 11 April 2018 | 10 June 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 281 | 284 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | |
Price now | $359.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 45.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1175 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,611 gflops | 6,463 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1920 |
Texture fill rate | 81.6 GTexel / s | 202.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 7,200 million |
CUDA cores | 1920 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 8-pin | |
Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
Vulkan | ||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 256 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 8 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |