NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1175 MHz
• Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1275 MHz
• 1691.2x more texture fill rate: 138.0 GTexel/s vs 81.6 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 5.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10167 vs 1810
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 750 vs 676
• 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55741 vs 17898

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile

• Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 100 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10167 1810
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	750 676
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	55741 17898

Compare specifications (specs)