AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 600x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 10 GB/s
Launch date | 11 April 2018 vs 27 May 2016 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 10 GB/s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1175 MHz
- Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1275 MHz
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 277.3 GTexel / s vs 81.6 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
- 3.4x better floating-point performance: 8,873 gflops vs 2,611 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 886 vs 676
- 8.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15560 vs 1810
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55425 vs 17990
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1175 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz vs 1275 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.3 GTexel / s vs 81.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1024 |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops vs 2,611 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 886 vs 676 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15560 vs 1810 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55425 vs 17990 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 | 886 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1810 | 15560 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17990 | 55425 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11173 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11173 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1557 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Baffin | GP104 |
Launch date | 11 April 2018 | 27 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 284 | 286 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Price now | $439.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1175 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,611 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2560 |
Texture fill rate | 81.6 GTexel / s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 7,200 million |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 8-pin | |
Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
Vulkan | ||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 320 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 10 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |