AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL vs AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- 991.2x more texture fill rate: 80.88 GTexel/s vs 81.6 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4769 vs 1810
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel/s vs 81.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 1024 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4769 vs 1810 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1175 MHz vs 931 MHz
- Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1275 MHz vs 1011 MHz
- 8.6x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective)
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 vs 370
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 April 2018 vs 1 February 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1175 MHz vs 931 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz vs 1011 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 vs 370 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 370 | 676 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4769 | 1810 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17880 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 22 | Baffin |
| Launch date | 1 February 2018 | 11 April 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 301 | 302 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1011 MHz | 1275 MHz |
| Compute performance | 20 | |
| Core clock speed | 931 MHz | 1175 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 161.8 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.588 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.588 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 32.35 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel/s | 81.6 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 65 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 5000 million | 3,000 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2,611 gflops | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | MXM-B (3.0) |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 1024 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective) | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
