AMD Radeon RX 560X vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 560X and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1175 MHz vs 1076 MHz
- 861.5x more texture fill rate: 81.60 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 669 vs 631
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4873 vs 3681
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4873 vs 3681
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3316
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3316
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 6 February 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1175 MHz vs 1076 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 669 vs 631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4873 vs 3681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4873 vs 3681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3316 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1275 MHz
- 1165.8x better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs
- Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 vs 5698
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 vs 5698
- Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6951 vs 3553
- Around 39% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22902 vs 16524
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1275 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops vs 2.6 TFLOPs |
Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 7000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10251 vs 5698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10251 vs 5698 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6951 vs 3553 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22902 vs 16524 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 560X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 560X | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5698 | 10251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5698 | 10251 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 669 | 631 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3553 | 6951 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16524 | 22902 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4873 | 3681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4873 | 3681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3316 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 113.416 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1414.794 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.736 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.206 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 417.823 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2958 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 560X | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Polaris 21 | GP106 |
Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 6 February 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 397 | 394 |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $585 | |
Price now | $429.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.44 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Compute units | 14/16 | |
Core clock speed | 1175 MHz | 1076 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2.6 TFLOPs | 3,031 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 20.40 GP/s | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
Texture fill rate | 81.60 GTexel/s | 94.72 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 4,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 170 mm | 201 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 5 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 140.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 7008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |