AMD Radeon RX 570 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 570 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 3685.9x more texture fill rate: 159.23 GTexel/s vs 43.2 billion / sec
- 16x more pipelines: 2048 vs 128
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 512 MB
- 6.4x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 9.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6967 vs 769
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 626 vs 366
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 28 March 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s vs 43.2 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 128 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 vs 769 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 vs 366 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
- Around 82% higher core clock speed: 1688 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz
- 84.7x better floating-point performance: 432.1 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 150 Watt
Core clock speed | 1688 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 432.1 gflops vs 5.1 TFLOPs |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6967 | 769 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 | 366 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35694 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.688 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.251 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.029 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 520.089 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9172 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3624 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9172 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3624 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 878 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 570 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Polaris 20 | G92 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 28 March 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | $299 |
Place in performance rating | 411 | 414 |
Price now | $149.99 | |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.00 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1206-1244 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 926-1168 MHz | 1688 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5.1 TFLOPs | 432.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 128 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.81 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 159.23 GTexel/s | 43.2 billion / sec |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 140 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 70.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |