AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1905 MHz vs 1590 MHz
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6144 MB
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16667 vs 10205
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 vs 487
- Around 70% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9486 vs 5570
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 vs 23 April 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1905 MHz vs 1590 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6144 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16667 vs 10205 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 vs 487 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9486 vs 5570 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16828 vs 14699
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15109 vs 3720
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 3369
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16828 vs 14699
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15109 vs 3720
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 3369
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16828 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 vs 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16828 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 vs 3369 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16667 | 10205 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 | 487 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77153 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 16828 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 15109 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 8054 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 16828 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 15109 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 8054 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9486 | 5570 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Turing |
Code name | Navi 10 | N18E-G0 |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 | 23 April 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $400 | |
Place in performance rating | 148 | 117 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1905 MHz | 1590 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texture fill rate | 304.8 GT/s | |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Transistor count | 10.3 B | 6600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | |
Pipelines | 1536 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6144 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |