AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs NVIDIA TITAN V
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and NVIDIA TITAN V videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1905 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 922 vs 899
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3949.565 vs 3583.136
- 12.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 vs 20.669
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 vs 7 December 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1905 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 vs 899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 vs 3583.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 vs 20.669 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3716 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN V
- Around 53% higher texture fill rate: 465.6 GTexel / s vs 304.8 GT/s
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19615 vs 16426
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 155351 vs 77315
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 270.561 vs 252.601
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 vs 24.769
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1504.373 vs 1322.129
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15401 vs 14699
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3369
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15401 vs 14699
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3369
- Around 68% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3577 vs 2135
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 465.6 GTexel / s vs 304.8 GT/s |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19615 vs 16426 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 155351 vs 77315 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.561 vs 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 vs 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 vs 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15401 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 vs 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15401 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 vs 3369 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3577 vs 2135 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA TITAN V |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16426 | 19615 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 922 | 899 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77315 | 155351 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | 270.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | 3583.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | 30.857 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | 20.669 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | 1504.373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 15401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 4193 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2135 | 3577 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | Volta |
Code name | Navi 10 | GV100 |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 | 7 December 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $400 | $2,999 |
Place in performance rating | 161 | 158 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1905 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texture fill rate | 304.8 GT/s | 465.6 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 10.3 B | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,899 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | |
Pipelines | 5120 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 652.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 3072 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |