AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 and AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1465 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14376 vs 12285
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 879 vs 731
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 vs 174.714
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.941 vs 17.305
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 vs 175.219
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3723 vs 3680
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3366 vs 3336
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3723 vs 3680
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3366 vs 3336
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 vs 10 July 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1465 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14376 vs 12285 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 vs 731 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 vs 174.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 vs 17.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 vs 175.219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 vs 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 vs 3336 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
- Around 55% higher texture fill rate: 384.0 GTexel / s vs 248.4 GT/s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 66605 vs 66087
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3924.968 vs 3686.851
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1226.861 vs 1036.448
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13848 vs 11536
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13848 vs 11536
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s vs 248.4 GT/s |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66605 vs 66087 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3924.968 vs 3686.851 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1226.861 vs 1036.448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13848 vs 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13848 vs 11536 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14376 | 12285 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 | 731 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66087 | 66605 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 174.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 3924.968 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 17.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 1226.861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1871 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 | 10 July 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $350 | $1,599 |
Place in performance rating | 204 | 207 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1465 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 248.4 GT/s | 384.0 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 230 Watt |
Transistor count | 10.3 B | 12,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | |
Pipelines | 4096 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |