AMD Radeon RX 5700 versus AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 and AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 22% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1465 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- Environ 28% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 180 Watt versus 230 Watt
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14376 versus 12285
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 879 versus 731
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 versus 174.714
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.941 versus 17.305
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 versus 175.219
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3723 versus 3680
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3366 versus 3336
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3723 versus 3680
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3366 versus 3336
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 10 July 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt versus 230 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14376 versus 12285 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 versus 731 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 versus 174.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 versus 17.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 versus 175.219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 versus 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 versus 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 versus 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 versus 3336 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
- Environ 55% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 384.0 GTexel / s versus 248.4 GT/s
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 66605 versus 66087
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3924.968 versus 3686.851
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1226.861 versus 1036.448
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13848 versus 11536
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13848 versus 11536
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 384.0 GTexel / s versus 248.4 GT/s |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66605 versus 66087 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3924.968 versus 3686.851 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1226.861 versus 1036.448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13848 versus 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13848 versus 11536 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14376 | 12285 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 | 731 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66087 | 66605 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 174.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 3924.968 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 17.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 1226.861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1871 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 5700 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 10 July 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $350 | $1,599 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 204 | 207 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1465 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 248.4 GT/s | 384.0 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 230 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | 12,500 million |
Performance á point flottant | 12,288 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | |
Pipelines | 4096 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | 6x mini-DisplayPort | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |