AMD Radeon RX 5700 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1645 MHz
- Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 879 vs 730
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 66142 vs 64134
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 209.509 vs 194.277
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3686.851 vs 1916.09
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.941 vs 17.951
- 7.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 vs 31.471
- Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1036.448 vs 545.751
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 July 2019 vs 1 October 2016 |
| Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1645 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 vs 730 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 66142 vs 64134 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 vs 194.277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 vs 1916.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 vs 17.951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 vs 31.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 vs 545.751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P6000
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1465 MHz
- Around 59% higher texture fill rate: 394.8 GTexel / s vs 248.4 GT/s
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15478 vs 14362
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20035 vs 11536
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20035 vs 11536
- 4.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8770 vs 1866
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1465 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 394.8 GTexel / s vs 248.4 GT/s |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15478 vs 14362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20035 vs 11536 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20035 vs 11536 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8770 vs 1866 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14362 | 15478 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 | 730 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 66142 | 64134 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | 194.277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | 1916.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | 17.951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | 31.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | 545.751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11536 | 20035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11536 | 20035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1866 | 8770 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | Pascal |
| Code name | Navi 10 | GP102 |
| Launch date | 7 July 2019 | 1 October 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $350 | $5,999 |
| Place in performance rating | 203 | 207 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Price now | $4,403.52 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.90 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz | 1645 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1465 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Texture fill rate | 248.4 GT/s | 394.8 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10.3 B | 11,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 12,634 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo | |
| Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync II | |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1 x 8-pin |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
| Width | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
| High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 5700 with others
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
AMDRadeon RX 5700 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6500 XT
