AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP vs AMD FirePro W9000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP and AMD FirePro W9000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1168 MHz vs 975 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5500 MHz
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7711 vs 6138
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34856 vs 31775
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 115.237 vs 84.462
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1890.261 vs 1734.394
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.121 vs 8.988
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 149.333 vs 86.984
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 614.542 vs 460.234
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 October 2018 vs 14 June 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1168 MHz vs 975 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 5500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7711 vs 6138 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34856 vs 31775 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.237 vs 84.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 vs 1734.394 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 vs 8.988 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 149.333 vs 86.984 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 614.542 vs 460.234 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9000
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 720 vs 662
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 720 vs 662 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | AMD FirePro W9000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7711 | 6138 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 662 | 720 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34856 | 31775 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.237 | 84.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | 1734.394 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | 8.988 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 149.333 | 86.984 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 614.542 | 460.234 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3782 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | AMD FirePro W9000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 20 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 15 October 2018 | 14 June 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 335 | 336 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,999 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1284 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1168 MHz | 975 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | 4,313 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,994 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 2048 | |
| Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 279 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5500 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP with others
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP vs
AMDFirePro W9000
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP vs
AMDRadeon RX 570X
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
