AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 662 vs 457
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34856 vs 32521
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 October 2018 vs 21 February 2018 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 662 vs 457 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34856 vs 32521 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1328 MHz vs 1168 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1476 MHz vs 1284 MHz
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8920 vs 7711
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12948 vs 9258
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12948 vs 9258
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1328 MHz vs 1168 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1476 MHz vs 1284 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 7000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8920 vs 7711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12948 vs 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12948 vs 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7711 | 8920 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 662 | 457 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34856 | 32521 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.237 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 149.333 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 614.542 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 | 12948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 | 12948 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3782 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Polaris 20 | GP104 |
Launch date | 15 October 2018 | 21 February 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 335 | 334 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1284 MHz | 1476 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1168 MHz | 1328 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 3,098 gflops | |
Pipelines | 1280 | |
Texture fill rate | 96.8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 7012 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 168.3 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |