AMD Radeon RX 580X vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 580X and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1340 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 85.5x more texture fill rate: 192.96 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 89% lower typical power consumption: 185 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 16x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11616 vs 10141
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11616 vs 10141
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4909 vs 3713
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4909 vs 3713
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 26 April 2016 |
| Boost clock speed | 1340 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 192.96 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11616 vs 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11616 vs 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4909 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4909 vs 3713 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- 3.6x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 2304
- 2642.6x better floating-point performance: 2x 8,192 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 18294
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 18294
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 787 vs 652
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8299 vs 7514
- Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55512 vs 41822
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2x 4096 vs 2304 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 8,192 gflops vs 6.2 TFLOPs |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 vs 18294 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 vs 18294 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 787 vs 652 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8299 vs 7514 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55512 vs 41822 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 580X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 580X | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11616 | 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11616 | 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4909 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4909 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18294 | 38251 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18294 | 38251 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 652 | 787 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7514 | 8299 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41822 | 55512 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 141.474 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.132 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.973 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 799.933 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 580X | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 20 | Capsaicin |
| Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | reference |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 26 April 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 193 | 192 |
| Type | Desktop, Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
| Price now | $849 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.05 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1340 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | 128 |
| Core clock speed | 1257 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 6.2 TFLOPs | 2x 8,192 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2x 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 42.88 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2304 | |
| Texture fill rate | 192.96 GTexel/s | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 185 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | 8,900 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 277 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 3x 8-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | DirectX® 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
