AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs AMD Radeon RX 5600M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 GME and AMD Radeon RX 5600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1265 MHz
- Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 182.2 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 660 vs 492
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 20161 vs 7694
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 20161 vs 7694
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 vs 7 Jan 2020 |
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 1265 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s vs 182.2 GTexel/s |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 660 vs 492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 vs 7694 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 vs 7694 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600M
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 175 Watt
- 6x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective)
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8669 vs 8573
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11117 vs 5140
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11117 vs 5140
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8904 vs 6839
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8904 vs 6839
- Around 33% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5888 vs 4431
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8669 vs 8573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11117 vs 5140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11117 vs 5140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8904 vs 6839 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8904 vs 6839 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5888 vs 4431 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5600M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | AMD Radeon RX 5600M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 660 | 492 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8573 | 8669 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5140 | 11117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5140 | 11117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6839 | 8904 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6839 | 8904 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 | 7694 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 | 7694 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4431 | 5888 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57191 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | AMD Radeon RX 5600M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA |
Code name | Polaris 20 | Navi 10 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 | 7 Jan 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 206 | 210 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1265 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 397.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 44.16 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | 182.2 GTexel/s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 5700 million | 10300 million |
Pipelines | 2304 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) | 12000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |