AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 GME and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1257 MHz vs 960 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 668 vs 540
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6839 vs 3720
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6839 vs 3720
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 20161 vs 3358
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 20161 vs 3358
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 vs 29 January 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz vs 960 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 668 vs 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6839 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6839 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 175 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective)
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11355 vs 8609
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17150 vs 5140
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17150 vs 5140
- Around 33% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5895 vs 4428
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 175 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11355 vs 8609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17150 vs 5140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17150 vs 5140 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5895 vs 4428 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 668 | 540 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8609 | 11355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5140 | 17150 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5140 | 17150 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6839 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6839 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4428 | 5895 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
Code name | Polaris 20 | TU106B |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 | 29 January 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 211 | 214 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz | 960 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 397.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 44.16 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 5700 million | 10,800 million |
Pipelines | 1920 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |