AMD Radeon RX 590 GME vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 590 GME and NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1257 MHz vs 1246 MHz
- 450x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 441.6 GTexel / s
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) vs 1752 MHz
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 660 vs 515
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6839 vs 3555
- Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6839 vs 3555
- 6.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 20161 vs 3198
- 6.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 20161 vs 3198
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 vs 21 June 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz vs 1246 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s vs 441.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) vs 1752 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 660 vs 515 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6839 vs 3555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6839 vs 3555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 vs 3198 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 vs 3198 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12633 vs 8573
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11451 vs 5140
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11451 vs 5140
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12633 vs 8573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11451 vs 5140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11451 vs 5140 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 660 | 515 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8573 | 12633 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5140 | 11451 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5140 | 11451 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6839 | 3555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6839 | 3555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 20161 | 3198 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 20161 | 3198 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4431 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 166109 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 590 GME | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Volta |
Code name | Polaris 20 | GV100 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Launch date | 9 Mar 2020 | 21 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 206 | 209 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1380 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1257 MHz | 1246 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 397.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 44.16 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | 441.6 GTexel / s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 5700 million | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,131 gflops | |
Pipelines | 5120 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 897.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8 Gbps effective) | 1752 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |