AMD Radeon RX 640 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 640 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 640

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 824 MHz
  • 985.6x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 39.55 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3278 vs 1435
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3278 vs 1435
  • Around 98% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10390 vs 5235
  • Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1952 vs 1877
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 May 2019 vs 22 April 2013
Core clock speed 1082 MHz vs 824 MHz
Texture fill rate 38.98 GTexel/s vs 39.55 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3278 vs 1435
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3278 vs 1435
Geekbench - OpenCL 10390 vs 5235
PassMark - G3D Mark 1952 vs 1877

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

  • Around 13% higher pipelines: 576 vs 512
  • 2.3x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3531 vs 1769
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3531 vs 1769
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3300 vs 2775
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3300 vs 2775
  • Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 340
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 576 vs 512
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3531 vs 1769
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3531 vs 1769
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3300 vs 2775
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3300 vs 2775
PassMark - G2D Mark 430 vs 340

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 640
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1769
3531
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1769
3531
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2775
3300
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2775
3300
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3278
1435
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3278
1435
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
10390
5235
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
340
430
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1952
1877
Name AMD Radeon RX 640 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1769 3531
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1769 3531
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2775 3300
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2775 3300
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3278 1435
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3278 1435
Geekbench - OpenCL 10390 5235
PassMark - G2D Mark 340 430
PassMark - G3D Mark 1952 1877
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 13.806
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 546.51
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 27.524
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 38.664

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 640 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Kepler
Code name Arctic Islands GK106
Launch date 13 May 2019 22 April 2013
Place in performance rating 811 964
Type Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1218 MHz
Compute units 8
Core clock speed 1082 MHz 824 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 77.95 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 1247 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 1247 GFLOPS
Pipelines 512 576
Pixel fill rate 19.49 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 38.98 GTexel/s 39.55 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 65 Watt
Transistor count 2200 million 2,540 million
Floating-point performance 949.2 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 5.7 inches (145 mm) 147 mm
Recommended system power (PSU) 350 Watt
Supplementary power connectors None None
Width Dual-slot

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 112.0 GB/s 64 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) 4000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)