AMD Radeon RX 6600M vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6600M and AMD Radeon Pro W5700X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600M
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1489 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1855 MHz
- Around 37% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 205 Watt
- Around 50% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 65885 vs 43810
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8612 vs 3714
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8006 vs 3364
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8612 vs 3714
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8006 vs 3364
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1489 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz vs 1855 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 205 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65885 vs 43810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8612 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8006 vs 3364 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8612 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8006 vs 3364 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
- Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 235.8 GTexel/s
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1792
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17591 vs 13833
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1060 vs 716
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16573 vs 14178
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16573 vs 14178
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 235.8 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1792 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17591 vs 13833 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1060 vs 716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16573 vs 14178 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16573 vs 14178 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6600M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6600M | AMD Radeon Pro W5700X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13833 | 17591 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 716 | 1060 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65885 | 43810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14178 | 16573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8612 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8006 | 3364 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14178 | 16573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8612 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8006 | 3364 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7981 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6600M | AMD Radeon Pro W5700X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | Navi 23 | Navi 10 |
Launch date | 2021 | Q3'2020 |
Place in performance rating | 156 | 153 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz | 1855 MHz |
Compute units | 28 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 1489 MHz | 1243 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 471.5 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.09 TFLOPS (2:1) | 17.79 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.544 TFLOPS | 9.5 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 134.7 GPixel/s | 123.5 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 235.8 GTexel/s | 277.9 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 205 Watt |
Transistor count | 11060 million | 10300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 1x HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |