AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 65% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 413.0 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 349.422 vs 323.141
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7129.567 vs 4756.579
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 197.183 vs 150.943
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1699.337 vs 1474.189
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 18062 vs 3717
- 15.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 50772 vs 3360
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 18062 vs 3717
- 15.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 50772 vs 3360
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Mar 2021 vs 1 Dec 2020 |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 349.422 vs 323.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 vs 4756.579 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 vs 150.943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 vs 1474.189 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 vs 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 vs 3360 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Around 90% higher pipelines: 4864 vs 2560
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 19824
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 946
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 100473
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 34.064
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 15315
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 15315
- Around 10% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 2435
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 4864 vs 2560 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 vs 19824 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 vs 946 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 vs 100473 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 vs 34.064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 15315 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 15315 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 vs 2435 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19824 | 20394 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 946 | 989 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 100473 | 109075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 349.422 | 323.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 | 4756.579 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.064 | 35.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 | 150.943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 | 1474.189 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15315 | 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15315 | 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2435 | 2671 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 22 | GA104 |
Launch date | 3 Mar 2021 | 1 Dec 2020 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $479 | $399 |
Place in performance rating | 51 | 104 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | 16.20 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 4864 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.2 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s | 253.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 17200 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 242 mm (9.5 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 350 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |