AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 55% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 50% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 1725 MHz
- Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 413.0 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7129.567 vs 5803.174
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 197.183 vs 182.055
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1699.337 vs 1664.554
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 18062 vs 13566
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 50772 vs 31930
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 18062 vs 13566
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 50772 vs 31930
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Mar 2021 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz vs 1725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 vs 5803.174 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 vs 182.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 vs 1664.554 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 vs 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 vs 31930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 vs 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 vs 31930 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- 2.3x more pipelines: 5888 vs 2560
- Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 220 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22360 vs 19873
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 996 vs 940
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123217 vs 99449
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 vs 349.422
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 vs 34.064
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 15315
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 15315
- Around 7% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13676 vs 12786
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 5888 vs 2560 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22360 vs 19873 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 996 vs 940 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123217 vs 99449 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 vs 349.422 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 vs 34.064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 vs 15315 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 vs 15315 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13676 vs 12786 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19873 | 22360 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 940 | 996 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99449 | 123217 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 349.422 | 453.922 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 | 5803.174 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.064 | 40.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 | 182.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 | 1664.554 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15315 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 | 31930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15315 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 | 31930 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 12786 | 13676 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 22 | GA104 |
Launch date | 3 Mar 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $479 | $499 |
Place in performance rating | 50 | 46 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2581 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.21 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 165.2 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 413.0 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 220 Watt |
Transistor count | 17200 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 242 mm, 9.5 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 550 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |