AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 570
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT and AMD Radeon RX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 97% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz
- Around 87% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1206-1244 MHz
- 4.1x more texture fill rate: 648.0 GTexel/s vs 159.23 GTexel/s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 4608 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25004 vs 6967
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1025 vs 626
- 4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 154220 vs 36107
- 5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 578.52 vs 105.688
- 6.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 52.561 vs 8.251
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 291.971 vs 79.029
- 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2700.97 vs 520.089
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16849 vs 9172
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3624
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3374 vs 3346
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16849 vs 9172
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3624
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3374 vs 3346
- 4.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3689 vs 880
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 vs 18 April 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1206-1244 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 648.0 GTexel/s vs 159.23 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4608 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25004 vs 6967 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1025 vs 626 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 154220 vs 36107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 578.52 vs 105.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 52.561 vs 8.251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 291.971 vs 79.029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2700.97 vs 520.089 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16849 vs 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3374 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16849 vs 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3374 vs 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3689 vs 880 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 570
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | AMD Radeon RX 570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25004 | 6967 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1025 | 626 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 154220 | 36107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 578.52 | 105.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 52.561 | 8.251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 291.971 | 79.029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2700.97 | 520.089 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16849 | 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3374 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16849 | 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3374 | 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3689 | 880 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1083.926 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | AMD Radeon RX 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Navi 21 | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | 18 April 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $169 |
Place in performance rating | 71 | 405 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop, Laptop |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Price now | $149.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.00 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1206-1244 MHz |
Compute units | 72 | |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 926-1168 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1296 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 41.47 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.74 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4608 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | 39.81 GP/s |
Texture fill rate | 648.0 GTexel/s | 159.23 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 5,700 million |
Floating-point performance | 5.1 TFLOPs | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 241 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | 450 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |