AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1680 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1920
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22131 vs 14119
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 988 vs 746
- Around 81% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 129479 vs 71402
- Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 432.118 vs 217.04
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.585 vs 21.707
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 383.037 vs 133.975
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2280.457 vs 1141.283
- 2.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3188 vs 1242
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 vs 7 January 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz vs 1680 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 1920 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22131 vs 14119 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 988 vs 746 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 129479 vs 71402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 432.118 vs 217.04 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.585 vs 21.707 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 vs 133.975 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2280.457 vs 1141.283 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3188 vs 1242 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 16162
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 3719
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 3373
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 16162
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 3719
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 3373
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 vs 16162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 vs 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 vs 3373 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 vs 16162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 vs 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 vs 3373 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6800 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22131 | 14119 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 988 | 746 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 129479 | 71402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 432.118 | 217.04 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.585 | 21.707 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 | 133.975 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2280.457 | 1141.283 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16162 | 20094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 7442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3373 | 6714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16162 | 20094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 7442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3373 | 6714 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3188 | 1242 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 21 | TU106 |
| Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | 7 January 2019 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $579 | $349 |
| Place in performance rating | 84 | 161 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $349.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz | 1680 MHz |
| Compute units | 60 | |
| Core clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1365 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1010 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.17 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 1920 |
| Pixel fill rate | 202.1 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 505.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| DisplayPort count | 2 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 229 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6800 with others
AMDRadeon RX 6800 vs
NVIDIAQuadro GP100
AMDRadeon RX 6800 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
AMDRadeon RX 6800 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 6800 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800M
AMDRadeon RX 6800 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
AMDRadeon RX 6800 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7700S
