AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1680 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1920
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 21044 vs 13832
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1049 vs 751
- Around 81% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 127776 vs 70465
- Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 432.118 vs 220.629
- Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.585 vs 21.852
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 383.037 vs 135.725
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2280.457 vs 1126.61
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8914 vs 3713
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5706 vs 3357
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8914 vs 3713
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5706 vs 3357
- 2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 15194 vs 7603
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 vs 7 January 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz vs 1680 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3840 vs 1920 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 21044 vs 13832 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1049 vs 751 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 127776 vs 70465 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 432.118 vs 220.629 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.585 vs 21.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 vs 135.725 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2280.457 vs 1126.61 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8914 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5706 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8914 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5706 vs 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 15194 vs 7603 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 16938
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 16938
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 vs 16938 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 vs 16938 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6800 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 21044 | 13832 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1049 | 751 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 127776 | 70465 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 432.118 | 220.629 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.585 | 21.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 | 135.725 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2280.457 | 1126.61 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16938 | 20094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8914 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5706 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16938 | 20094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8914 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5706 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 15194 | 7603 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3131.344 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 21 | TU106 |
| Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | 7 January 2019 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $579 | $349 |
| Place in performance rating | 9 | 8 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $349.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz | 1680 MHz |
| Compute units | 60 | |
| Core clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1365 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1010 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.17 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 1920 |
| Pixel fill rate | 202.1 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 505.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| DisplayPort count | 2 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 229 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6800 with others
AMDRadeon RX 6800 vs
NVIDIATesla T10 Processor
AMDRadeon RX 6800 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Ti
AMDRadeon RX 6800 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060
AMDRadeon RX 6800 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
AMDRadeon RX 6800 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT
AMDRadeon RX 6800 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Laptop
