AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1680 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1920
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22309 vs 14150
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 973 vs 751
- Around 79% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 126068 vs 70387
- Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 432.118 vs 220.337
- Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.585 vs 21.852
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 383.037 vs 135.923
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2280.457 vs 1141.283
- 2.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 16322 vs 7491
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 vs 7 January 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz vs 1680 MHz |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 1920 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22309 vs 14150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 973 vs 751 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 126068 vs 70387 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 432.118 vs 220.337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.585 vs 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 vs 135.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2280.457 vs 1141.283 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 16322 vs 7491 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 16162
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 3719
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 3373
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 16162
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 3719
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 3373
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 vs 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 vs 3373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 vs 16162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 vs 3373 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6800 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22309 | 14150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 973 | 751 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 126068 | 70387 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 432.118 | 220.337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.585 | 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 383.037 | 135.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2280.457 | 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16162 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3373 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16162 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3373 | 6714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 16322 | 7491 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3131.344 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6800 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 21 | TU106 |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | 7 January 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $579 | $349 |
Place in performance rating | 77 | 150 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Compute units | 60 | |
Core clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1010 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.17 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 202.1 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 505.2 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 160 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
DisplayPort count | 2 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 40 mm (1.6 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 229 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |