AMD Radeon RX 6800M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6800M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 65% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1410 MHz
• Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 2581 MHz vs 1665 MHz
• Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 413.0 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
• Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
• 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 18453 vs 3717
• 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 16764 vs 3360
• 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 18453 vs 3717
• 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 16764 vs 3360

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

• Around 90% higher pipelines: 4864 vs 2560
• Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 230 Watt
• Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20547 vs 13294
• Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 996 vs 549
• Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 107110 vs 87841
• Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 17137
• Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 17137
• Around 3% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 11654 vs 11262

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13294 20547
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	549 996
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	87841 107110
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17137 27478
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18453 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16764 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17137 27478
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18453 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16764 3360
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	11262 11654

Compare specifications (specs)