AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 6800M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT and AMD Radeon RX 6800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 2581 MHz
- Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 416.0 GTexel/s vs 413.0 GTexel/s
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 951 vs 544
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20809 vs 13256
- Around 20% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13507 vs 11254
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 106079 vs 88030
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 2600 MHz vs 2581 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 416.0 GTexel/s vs 413.0 GTexel/s |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 951 vs 544 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20809 vs 13256 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13507 vs 11254 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 106079 vs 88030 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 2150 MHz
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 250 Watt
Launch date | 2021 vs 3 Mar 2022 |
Core clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 2150 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6800M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 951 | 544 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20809 | 13256 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13507 | 11254 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 106079 | 88030 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 359.653 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7156.733 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.495 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.072 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 866.201 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17137 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18453 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 16764 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17137 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18453 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 16764 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6800M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 22 | Navi 22 |
Launch date | 3 Mar 2022 | 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 80 | 78 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2600 MHz | 2581 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 2150 MHz | 2321 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 832.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.62 TFLOPS (2:1) | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.31 TFLOPS | 13.21 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 166.4 GPixel/s | 165.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 416.0 GTexel/s | 413.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 230 Watt |
Transistor count | 17200 million | 17200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 110 mm, 4.3 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |