AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 720.0 GTexel/s vs 648.0 GTexel/s
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 4608
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26857 vs 25112
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1048 vs 1020
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 160986 vs 150004
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 vs 291.971
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17213 vs 16849
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17213 vs 16849
- Around 8% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 20911 vs 19418
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s vs 648.0 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 4608 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26857 vs 25112 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1048 vs 1020 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 160986 vs 150004 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 vs 291.971 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 vs 16849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 vs 16849 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20911 vs 19418 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 578.52 vs 543.753
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 52.561 vs 51.155
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2700.97 vs 2566.9
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3374 vs 3350
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3374 vs 3350
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 578.52 vs 543.753 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 52.561 vs 51.155 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2700.97 vs 2566.9 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3374 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3374 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26857 | 25112 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1048 | 1020 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 160986 | 150004 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 | 578.52 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 | 52.561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 | 291.971 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 | 2700.97 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 | 16849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3374 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 | 16849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3374 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20911 | 19418 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Code name | Navi 21 | Navi 21 |
| Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | 28 Oct 2020 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $649 |
| Place in performance rating | 70 | 62 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Compute units | 80 | 72 |
| Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1825 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) | 1296 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) | 41.47 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.04 TFLOPS | 20.74 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 4608 |
| Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | 288.0 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s | 648.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Transistor count | 26800 million | 26800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Triple-slot | |
| Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | 50 mm (2 inches) |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | 700 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT with others
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
IntelArc A770
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650 XT
