NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• 2x more pipelines: 10240 vs 5120
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26935 vs 26746
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1088 vs 1052
• Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 209081 vs 166557
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 60.472 vs 51.155
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34770 vs 17213
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34770 vs 17213

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

• Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1365 MHz
• Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1665 MHz
• Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 720.0 GTexel/s vs 532.8 GTexel/s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
• Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 300 Watt vs 350 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
• Around 68% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 543.753 vs 485.179
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 vs 129.036
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2566.9 vs 2441.001
• 4.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 21090 vs 5077

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	26935 26746
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1088 1052
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	209081 166557
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	485.179 543.753
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	60.472 51.155
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	129.036 320.733
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2441.001 2566.9
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34770 17213
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34770 17213
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3350
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	5077 21090

Compare specifications (specs)