NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 2x more pipelines: 10240 vs 5120
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 27219 vs 26855
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1092 vs 1048
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 209081 vs 161035
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 714.26 vs 543.753
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 60.192 vs 51.155
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2585.274 vs 2566.9
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34770 vs 17213
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34770 vs 17213
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 May 2021 vs 28 Oct 2020 |
Pipelines | 10240 vs 5120 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27219 vs 26855 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1092 vs 1048 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 vs 161035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 714.26 vs 543.753 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.192 vs 51.155 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2585.274 vs 2566.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 vs 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 vs 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 720.0 GTexel/s vs 532.8 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 300 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 68% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 vs 129.036
- Around 6% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 20909 vs 19749
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s vs 532.8 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 12 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 vs 129.036 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20909 vs 19749 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27219 | 26855 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1092 | 1048 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 | 161035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 714.26 | 543.753 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.977 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.192 | 51.155 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.036 | 320.733 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2585.274 | 2566.9 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 | 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 | 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19749 | 20909 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | GA102 | Navi 21 |
Launch date | 31 May 2021 | 28 Oct 2020 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1199 | $999 |
Place in performance rating | 49 | 70 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 2250 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1825 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 532.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1) | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS | 23.04 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 10240 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 186.5 GPixel/s | 288.0 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 532.8 GTexel/s | 720.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 26800 million |
Compute units | 80 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Triple-slot |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | 50 mm (2 inches) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | 700 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 120 mm (4.7 inches) |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 912.4 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |