AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT versus AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Environ 11% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 720.0 GTexel/s versus 648.0 GTexel/s
- Environ 11% de pipelines plus haut: 5120 versus 4608
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 26852 versus 25107
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1048 versus 1020
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 161057 versus 150072
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 320.733 versus 291.971
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17213 versus 16849
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17213 versus 16849
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 20909 versus 19416
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 720.0 GTexel/s versus 648.0 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 5120 versus 4608 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26852 versus 25107 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1048 versus 1020 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 161057 versus 150072 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 versus 291.971 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 versus 16849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 versus 16849 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20909 versus 19416 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 578.52 versus 543.753
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 52.561 versus 51.155
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2700.97 versus 2566.9
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3374 versus 3350
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3374 versus 3350
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 578.52 versus 543.753 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 52.561 versus 51.155 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2700.97 versus 2566.9 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3374 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3374 versus 3350 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26852 | 25107 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1048 | 1020 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 161057 | 150072 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 | 578.52 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 | 52.561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 | 291.971 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 | 2700.97 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 | 16849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3374 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 | 16849 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3374 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20909 | 19416 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Navi 21 | Navi 21 |
| Date de sortie | 28 Oct 2020 | 28 Oct 2020 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | $649 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 70 | 62 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 2250 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 80 | 72 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1825 MHz | 1825 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) | 1296 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) | 41.47 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.04 TFLOPS | 20.74 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 5120 | 4608 |
| Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | 288.0 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 720.0 GTexel/s | 648.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 26800 million | 26800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Triple-slot | |
| Hauteur | 50 mm (2 inches) | 50 mm (2 inches) |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | 700 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 512 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
IntelArc A770
AMDRadeon RX 6900 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650 XT
