AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1215 MHz
  • Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1440 MHz
  • 2.2x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2304
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
  • 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 24791 vs 12354
  • Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1092 vs 601
  • 2.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19042 vs 7587
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 28 Oct 2020 vs 29 January 2019
Core clock speed 1825 MHz vs 1215 MHz
Boost clock speed 2250 MHz vs 1440 MHz
Pipelines 5120 vs 2304
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 12 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 24791 vs 12354
PassMark - G2D Mark 1092 vs 601
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 19042 vs 7587

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

  • 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 300 Watt
  • 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19760 vs 15832
  • Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 20062 vs 14528
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30848 vs 13433
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19760 vs 15832
  • Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 20062 vs 14528
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30848 vs 13433
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt vs 300 Watt
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19760 vs 15832
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 20062 vs 14528
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 30848 vs 13433
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19760 vs 15832
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 20062 vs 14528
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 30848 vs 13433

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
24791
12354
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1092
601
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15832
19760
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14528
20062
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13433
30848
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15832
19760
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14528
20062
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13433
30848
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
19042
7587
Name AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark 24791 12354
PassMark - G2D Mark 1092 601
Geekbench - OpenCL 163846
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 472.207
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 51.709
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 320.733
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2566.9
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15832 19760
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 14528 20062
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 13433 30848
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15832 19760
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 14528 20062
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 13433 30848
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 19042 7587

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 2.0 Turing
Code name Navi 21 TU106
Launch date 28 Oct 2020 29 January 2019
Launch price (MSRP) $999
Place in performance rating 5 9
Type Desktop Laptop
Price now $489.99
Value for money (0-100) 49.06

Technical info

Boost clock speed 2250 MHz 1440 MHz
Compute units 80
Core clock speed 1825 MHz 1215 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 1440 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 23.04 TFLOPS
Pipelines 5120 2304
Pixel fill rate 288.0 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 720.0 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 300 Watt 115 Watt
Transistor count 26800 million 10,800 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor Triple-slot
Height 50 mm (2 inches)
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm (10.5 inches)
Recommended system power (PSU) 700 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin
Width 120 mm (4.7 inches)

API support

DirectX 12.2 12.0
OpenCL 2.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB
Memory bandwidth 512 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) 14000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6