AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1825 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- 2.2x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26853 vs 12354
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1048 vs 601
- 2.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 20909 vs 7453
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 vs 29 January 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 2304 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26853 vs 12354 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1048 vs 601 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20909 vs 7453 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18604 vs 17213
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8898 vs 3714
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8029 vs 3350
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18604 vs 17213
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8898 vs 3714
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8029 vs 3350
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18604 vs 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8029 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18604 vs 17213 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8029 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26853 | 12354 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1048 | 601 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 161035 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 543.753 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.155 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 320.733 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2566.9 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17213 | 18604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 8898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 8029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17213 | 18604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 8898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 8029 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 20909 | 7453 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 21 | TU106 |
Launch date | 28 Oct 2020 | 29 January 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Place in performance rating | 70 | 128 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Price now | $489.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.06 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Compute units | 80 | |
Core clock speed | 1825 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1440 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 46.08 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.04 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 5120 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 288.0 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 720.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Triple-slot | |
Height | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Width | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |