AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1240 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 55 GTexel / s vs 35.2 GTexel / s
Around 38% higher pipelines: 704 vs 512
Around 56% better floating-point performance: 1,760 gflops vs 1,126 gflops
Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2106 vs 1527
Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 518 vs 399
Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14583 vs 8941

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 February 2018 vs 24 November 2017
Boost clock speed	1240 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Texture fill rate	55 GTexel / s vs 35.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	704 vs 512
Floating-point performance	1,760 gflops vs 1,126 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2106 vs 1527
PassMark - G2D Mark	518 vs 399
Geekbench - OpenCL	14583 vs 8941

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile

6.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 65 Watt
Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3157 vs 1857
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3107
Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3157 vs 1857
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3107

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3157 vs 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3107
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3157 vs 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3107

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2106

1527

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

518

399

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

14583

8941

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1857

3157

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3107

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1857

3157

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3107

3359

Name	AMD Radeon RX Vega 11	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark	2106	1527
PassMark - G2D Mark	518	399
Geekbench - OpenCL	14583	8941
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	40.991
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	364.578
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	54.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	262.35
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1857	3157
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3107	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1857	3157
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3107	3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1201

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX Vega 11	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 5.0	GCN 5.0
Code name	Raven	Vega
Launch date	13 February 2018	24 November 2017
Place in performance rating	795	665
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1240 MHz	1100 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	300 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,760 gflops	1,126 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	704	512
Texture fill rate	55 GTexel / s	35.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	10 Watt
Transistor count	4,940 million	4,500 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.6
Memory
Shared memory	0
Maximum RAM amount		256 MB
Memory bandwidth		12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		800 MHz
Memory type		DDR4