AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 55 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s
- 2.2x more pipelines: 704 vs 320
- 5.5x better floating-point performance: 1,760 gflops vs 320.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 5.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2106 vs 401
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 518 vs 320
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 9 January 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 55 GTexel / s vs 16 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 704 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 1,760 gflops vs 320.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2106 vs 401 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 518 vs 320 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3262 vs 3107
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3262 vs 3107
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3262 vs 3107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3262 vs 3107 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2106 | 401 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 518 | 320 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14583 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.991 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.578 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.196 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 262.35 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3455 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1857 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 | 3262 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3455 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1857 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 | 3262 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1201 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Raven | M96 |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 9 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 795 | 792 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1240 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,760 gflops | 320.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 704 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 55 GTexel / s | 16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 19.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |