AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and NVIDIA Quadro K1200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1240 MHz vs 1124 MHz
  • Around 53% higher texture fill rate: 55 GTexel / s vs 35.97 GTexel / s
  • Around 38% higher pipelines: 704 vs 512
  • Around 53% better floating-point performance: 1,760 gflops vs 1,151 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 65% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14574 vs 8824
  • Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.991 vs 31.949
  • Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.196 vs 2.629
  • 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.784 vs 25.411
  • 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 262.35 vs 117.722
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1857 vs 1721
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1857 vs 1721
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 February 2018 vs 28 January 2015
Boost clock speed 1240 MHz vs 1124 MHz
Texture fill rate 55 GTexel / s vs 35.97 GTexel / s
Pipelines 704 vs 512
Floating-point performance 1,760 gflops vs 1,151 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 14574 vs 8824
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 40.991 vs 31.949
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.196 vs 2.629
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 54.784 vs 25.411
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 262.35 vs 117.722
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1857 vs 1721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1857 vs 1721

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1200

  • 3.5x more core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2949 vs 2109
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 579 vs 520
  • Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 466.139 vs 364.578
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4080 vs 3455
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3288 vs 3107
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4080 vs 3455
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3288 vs 3107
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1058 MHz vs 300 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2949 vs 2109
PassMark - G2D Mark 579 vs 520
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 466.139 vs 364.578
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4080 vs 3455
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3288 vs 3107
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4080 vs 3455
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3288 vs 3107

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1200

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2109
2949
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
520
579
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
14574
8824
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
40.991
31.949
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
364.578
466.139
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3.196
2.629
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
54.784
25.411
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
262.35
117.722
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3455
4080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1857
1721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3107
3288
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3455
4080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1857
1721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3107
3288
Name AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 NVIDIA Quadro K1200
PassMark - G3D Mark 2109 2949
PassMark - G2D Mark 520 579
Geekbench - OpenCL 14574 8824
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 40.991 31.949
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 364.578 466.139
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.196 2.629
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 54.784 25.411
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 262.35 117.722
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3455 4080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1857 1721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3107 3288
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3455 4080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1857 1721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3107 3288
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1201

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 NVIDIA Quadro K1200

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.0 Maxwell
Code name Raven GM107
Launch date 13 February 2018 28 January 2015
Place in performance rating 797 798
Type Desktop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $321.97
Price now $289.99
Value for money (0-100) 13.00

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1240 MHz 1124 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 1058 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,760 gflops 1,151 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 704 512
Texture fill rate 55 GTexel / s 35.97 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt
Transistor count 4,940 million 1,870 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort, mDP mDP mDP mDP
Number of simultaneous displays 4

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None
Length 160 mm
Width 1" (2.5 cm)

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 5
Vulkan

Memory

Shared memory 0
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz
Memory type 128 Bit

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management