AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and NVIDIA Quadro K1200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1240 MHz vs 1124 MHz
- Around 53% higher texture fill rate: 55 GTexel / s vs 35.97 GTexel / s
- Around 38% higher pipelines: 704 vs 512
- Around 53% better floating-point performance: 1,760 gflops vs 1,151 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 65% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14574 vs 8824
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.991 vs 31.949
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.196 vs 2.629
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.784 vs 25.411
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 262.35 vs 117.722
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1857 vs 1721
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1857 vs 1721
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 28 January 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1240 MHz vs 1124 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 55 GTexel / s vs 35.97 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 704 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 1,760 gflops vs 1,151 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14574 vs 8824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.991 vs 31.949 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.196 vs 2.629 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.784 vs 25.411 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 262.35 vs 117.722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1857 vs 1721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1857 vs 1721 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1200
- 3.5x more core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2949 vs 2109
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 579 vs 520
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 466.139 vs 364.578
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4080 vs 3455
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3288 vs 3107
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4080 vs 3455
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3288 vs 3107
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1058 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2949 vs 2109 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 579 vs 520 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 466.139 vs 364.578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4080 vs 3455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3288 vs 3107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4080 vs 3455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3288 vs 3107 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | NVIDIA Quadro K1200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2109 | 2949 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 520 | 579 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14574 | 8824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.991 | 31.949 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.578 | 466.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.196 | 2.629 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.784 | 25.411 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 262.35 | 117.722 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3455 | 4080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1857 | 1721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 | 3288 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3455 | 4080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1857 | 1721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 | 3288 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1201 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | NVIDIA Quadro K1200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Raven | GM107 |
Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 28 January 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 797 | 798 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $321.97 | |
Price now | $289.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.00 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1240 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,760 gflops | 1,151 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 704 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 55 GTexel / s | 35.97 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort, mDP mDP mDP mDP |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 160 mm | |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 0 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory type | 128 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |