AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
  • Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1677 MHz vs 1645 MHz
  • 1087.4x more texture fill rate: 429.30 GTexel/s vs 394.8 GTexel / s
  • Around 7% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3840
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 August 2017 vs 1 October 2016
Boost clock speed 1677 MHz vs 1645 MHz
Texture fill rate 429.30 GTexel/s vs 394.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines 4096 vs 3840
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 16 nm
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3723 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3723 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3362 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3362 vs 3356

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P6000

  • Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1406 MHz
  • 922.2x better floating-point performance: 12,634 gflops vs 13.7 TFLOPs
  • Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 345 Watt
  • 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
  • 4.8x more memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 1890 MHz
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20035 vs 19324
  • Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20035 vs 19324
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1506 MHz vs 1406 MHz
Floating-point performance 12,634 gflops vs 13.7 TFLOPs
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt vs 345 Watt
Maximum memory size 24 GB vs 8 GB
Memory clock speed 9016 MHz vs 1890 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20035 vs 19324
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20035 vs 19324

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19324
20035
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19324
20035
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3723
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3723
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3362
3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3362
3356
Name AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling NVIDIA Quadro P6000
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19324 20035
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19324 20035
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3723 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3723 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3362 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3362 3356
PassMark - G3D Mark 15436
PassMark - G2D Mark 727
Geekbench - OpenCL 64167
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 194.277
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1916.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 17.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 31.471
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 545.751
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 8770

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling NVIDIA Quadro P6000

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.0 Pascal
Code name Vega 10 GP102
Design Radeon RX Vega Series
Launch date 7 August 2017 1 October 2016
Launch price (MSRP) $699 $5,999
Place in performance rating 221 224
Type Desktop Workstation
Price now $4,403.52
Value for money (0-100) 3.90

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1677 MHz 1645 MHz
Compute units 64
Core clock speed 1406 MHz 1506 MHz
Floating-point performance 13.7 TFLOPs 12,634 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 840 GFLOPs
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 26.7 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 13.4 TFLOPs
Pipelines 4096 3840
Pixel fill rate 107.30 GP/s
Render output units 64
Stream Processors 4096
Texture fill rate 429.30 GTexel/s 394.8 GTexel / s
Texture Units 256
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 345 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 12,500 million 11,800 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
Multi-display synchronization Quadro Sync II
Number of simultaneous displays 4

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 282 mm 267 mm
Recommended system power (PSU) 1000 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin 1 x 8-pin
SLI options 1
Width 2" (5.1 cm)

API support

DirectX 12 12
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Vulkan
Shader Model 5.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 24 GB
Memory bandwidth 483.8 GB/s
Memory bus width 2048 bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 1890 MHz 9016 MHz
Memory type HBM2 384 Bit

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
FreeSync
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore
3D Vision Pro
ECC (Error Correcting Code)
High-Performance Video I/O6
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management