AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling versus NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1677 MHz versus 1645 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 429.30 GTexel/s versus 394.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 4096 versus 3840
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 August 2017 versus 1 October 2016 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1677 MHz versus 1645 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 429.30 GTexel/s versus 394.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 4096 versus 3840 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 versus 3356 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P6000
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 1406 MHz
- 922.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 12,634 gflops versus 13.7 TFLOPs
- Environ 38% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 345 Watt
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 24 GB versus 8 GB
- 4.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 9016 MHz versus 1890 MHz
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20035 versus 19324
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20035 versus 19324
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 1406 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 12,634 gflops versus 13.7 TFLOPs |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 345 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 8 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 9016 MHz versus 1890 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20035 versus 19324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20035 versus 19324 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19324 | 20035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19324 | 20035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 | 3356 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15436 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 727 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64167 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 194.277 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1916.09 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.951 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.471 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 545.751 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8770 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
| Nom de code | Vega 10 | GP102 |
| Conception | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
| Date de sortie | 7 August 2017 | 1 October 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | $5,999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 221 | 224 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Prix maintenant | $4,403.52 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 3.90 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1677 MHz | 1645 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 64 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1406 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 13.7 TFLOPs | 12,634 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.7 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.4 TFLOPs | |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 3840 |
| Pixel fill rate | 107.30 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 4096 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 429.30 GTexel/s | 394.8 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 256 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 345 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 12,500 million | 11,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Synchronization de plusieurs écrans | Quadro Sync II | |
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 282 mm | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 1000 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 1 x 8-pin |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Largeur | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 24 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 483.8 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz | 9016 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | 384 Bit |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
| High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs
NVIDIAQuadro P6000
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs
AppleA14 Bionic
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs
IntelArc A310
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs
AMDRadeon 740M
