AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid vs AMD FirePro M3900
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid and AMD FirePro M3900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 87% higher core clock speed: 1406 MHz vs 750 MHz
- 2.2x more boost clock speed: 1677 MHz vs 750 MHz
- 71.6x more texture fill rate: 429.3 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s
- 25.6x more pipelines: 4096 vs 160
- 57.2x better floating-point performance: 13,738 gflops vs 240 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 5% higher memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Launch date | 8 August 2017 vs 19 October 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1406 MHz vs 750 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1677 MHz vs 750 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 429.3 GTexel / s vs 6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 13,738 gflops vs 240 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M3900
- 11.3x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 225 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M3900
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid | AMD FirePro M3900 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7765 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4446 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid | AMD FirePro M3900 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Vega 10 | Seymour |
Launch date | 8 August 2017 | 19 October 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 256 | 1652 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1677 MHz | 750 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1406 MHz | 750 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 13,738 gflops | 240 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 429.3 GTexel / s | 6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Bus support | n / a | |
Form factor | chip-down | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB / s | 14 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity |