AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid vs AMD Radeon R9 M485X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid and AMD Radeon R9 M485X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 94% higher core clock speed: 1406 MHz vs 723 MHz
- 4.6x more texture fill rate: 429.3 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 4096 vs 2048
- 4.6x better floating-point performance: 13,738 gflops vs 2,961 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
Launch date | 8 August 2017 vs 15 May 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1406 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 429.3 GTexel / s vs 92.54 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 13,738 gflops vs 2,961 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M485X
- 2.6x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M485X
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid | AMD Radeon R9 M485X |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7765 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 417 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3661 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid | AMD Radeon R9 M485X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Vega 10 | Amethyst |
Launch date | 8 August 2017 | 15 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 97 | 291 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1677 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1406 MHz | 723 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 13,738 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 429.3 GTexel / s | 92.54 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Technologies |
||
Enduro |