AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 vs AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1247 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 183.2x more texture fill rate: 395.80 GTexel/s vs 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 8192 vs 2x 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 97% lower typical power consumption: 295 Watt vs 580 Watt
Launch date | 7 August 2017 vs 3 September 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1247 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 395.80 GTexel/s vs 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Pipelines | 8192 vs 2x 2560 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 295 Watt vs 580 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
- 806.3x better floating-point performance: 2x 5,120 gflops vs 12.7 TFLOPs
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 8 GB vs 8 GB
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1890 MHz
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.128 vs 14.889
Specifications (specs) | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 5,120 gflops vs 12.7 TFLOPs |
Maximum memory size | 2x 8 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.128 vs 14.889 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14394 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.478 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2129.009 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.889 | 21.128 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.271 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1328.033 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14744 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14744 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7522 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Vega 10 | Grenada |
Design | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Launch date | 7 August 2017 | 3 September 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $1,399 |
Place in performance rating | 170 | 246 |
Price now | $449.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 41.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1546 MHz | |
Compute units | 64 | |
Core clock speed | 1247 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 12.7 TFLOPs | 2x 5,120 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.4 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 8192 | 2x 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 98.90 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Texture fill rate | 395.80 GTexel/s | 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 295 Watt | 580 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 6,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 279 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 4x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2x 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | 2x 345.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 2x 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | 5400 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |