AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs Intel UHD Graphics 620

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile and Intel UHD Graphics 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Video outputs and ports, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile

Intel UHD Graphics 620

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24
Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 399 vs 241
Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1527 vs 1042
Around 95% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8941 vs 4592
3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3157 vs 878
3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3157 vs 878
Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2227
Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2227

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	24 November 2017 vs 1 September 2017
Pipelines	512 vs 24
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt vs 15 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	399 vs 241
PassMark - G3D Mark	1527 vs 1042
Geekbench - OpenCL	8941 vs 4592
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3157 vs 878
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3157 vs 878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 2227
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 2227

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1100 MHz
128x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 256 MB

Boost clock speed	1150 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Maximum memory size	32 GB vs 256 MB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

399

241

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1527

1042

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8941

4592

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3157

878

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3157

878

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

2227

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

2227

Name	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile	Intel UHD Graphics 620
PassMark - G2D Mark	399	241
PassMark - G3D Mark	1527	1042
Geekbench - OpenCL	8941	4592
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3157	878
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3157	878
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	2227
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	2227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		27.062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		273.504
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		19.939
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		31.881
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		1397
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		62

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile	Intel UHD Graphics 620
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 5.0	Generation 9.5
Code name	Vega	Kaby Lake GT2
Launch date	24 November 2017	1 September 2017
Place in performance rating	665	1380
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1150 MHz
Core clock speed	300 MHz	300 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,126 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	512	24
Texture fill rate	35.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt	15 Watt
Transistor count	4,500 million	189 million
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	32 GB
Memory bandwidth	12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz
Memory type	DDR4	LPDDR3 / DDR4
Shared memory		1
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors		No outputs
API support
DirectX		12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL		4.5
Technologies
Quick Sync