AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro M2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Video outputs and ports, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 55 Watt
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 399 vs 336
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8941 vs 8148
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 24 November 2017 vs 3 December 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1098 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 55 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 vs 336 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8941 vs 8148 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3355 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 43.92 GTexel / s vs 35.2 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
- Around 25% better floating-point performance: 1,405 gflops vs 1,126 gflops
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- 6.3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3446 vs 1527
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3157
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3157
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 GTexel / s vs 35.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops vs 1,126 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3446 vs 1527 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3157 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 | 336 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1527 | 3446 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8941 | 8148 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3157 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3157 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3355 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.281 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 782.113 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.5 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.048 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 172.896 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4920 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4920 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Vega | GM107 |
| Launch date | 24 November 2017 | 3 December 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 665 | 700 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1098 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,126 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 35.2 GTexel / s | 43.92 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,500 million | 1,870 million |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 80 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 Mobile with others
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 6970
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs
AMDFirePro D500
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R7 M270DX
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 965M
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 A375
AMDRadeon RX Vega 8 Mobile vs
IntelArc Pro A40
