AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH and AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1063 MHz vs 931 MHz
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1190 MHz vs 1011 MHz
- Around 41% higher texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel / s vs 80.88 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1280
- Around 41% better floating-point performance: 3,656 gflops vs 2,588 gflops
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6581 vs 3880
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 773 vs 461
- Around 39% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27108 vs 19490
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8931 vs 6318
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 2070
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1514
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8931 vs 6318
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 2070
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1514
- Around 39% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2911 vs 2091
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1063 MHz vs 931 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz vs 1011 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel / s vs 80.88 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 1280 |
Floating-point performance | 3,656 gflops vs 2,588 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6581 vs 3880 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 773 vs 461 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27108 vs 19490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8931 vs 6318 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 2070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8931 vs 6318 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 2070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 1514 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2911 vs 2091 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 100 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6581 | 3880 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 773 | 461 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27108 | 19490 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8931 | 6318 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 2070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8931 | 6318 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 2070 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 1514 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2911 | 2091 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.971 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.247 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.195 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.289 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 252.311 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Polaris 22 | Polaris 22 |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 | 1 February 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 325 | 589 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | 1011 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1063 MHz | 931 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,656 gflops | 2,588 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel / s | 80.88 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 65 Watt |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB / s | 204.8 GB / s |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | HBM2 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Memory bus width | 1024 Bit |