AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH vs AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH and AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1063 MHz vs 950 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1190 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 375 Watt
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6581 vs 5214
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 773 vs 658
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2018 vs 24 April 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1063 MHz vs 950 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 375 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6581 vs 5214 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 773 vs 658 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
- 18.6x more texture fill rate: 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 114.2 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 1536
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,096 gflops vs 3,656 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 2x 3 GB vs 4 GB
- 3.8x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
| Texture fill rate | 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 114.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 2048 vs 1536 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 4,096 gflops vs 3,656 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 2x 3 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH | AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6581 | 5214 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 773 | 658 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27108 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8931 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8931 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2911 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.481 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1984.655 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.536 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.504 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 470.237 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH | AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 22 | Malta |
| Launch date | 1 February 2018 | 24 April 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 325 | 327 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1063 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 3,656 gflops | 2x 4,096 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 2x 2048 |
| Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel / s | 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 375 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 307 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB / s | 2x 288.0 GB / s |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Memory bus width | 2x 384 Bit | |

