AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH and NVIDIA Quadro CX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 77% higher core clock speed: 1063 MHz vs 602 MHz
- 3x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel / s vs 38.5 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 1536 vs 192
- 7.9x better floating-point performance: 3,656 gflops vs 462.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1536 MB
- 6.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6579 vs 947
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 774 vs 454
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 vs 11 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1063 MHz vs 602 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel / s vs 38.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 3,656 gflops vs 462.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1536 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6579 vs 947 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 774 vs 454 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro CX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH | NVIDIA Quadro CX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6579 | 947 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 774 | 454 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27100 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8931 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8931 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2911 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH | NVIDIA Quadro CX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 22 | GT200B |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 | 11 November 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 325 | 323 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,999 | |
Price now | $149.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.20 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1063 MHz | 602 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,656 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel / s | 38.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit |