AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 97% higher core clock speed: 1063 MHz vs 540 MHz
- 26.4x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s
- 192x more pipelines: 1536 vs 8
- 211.6x better floating-point performance: 3,656 gflops vs 17.28 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 60.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6579 vs 108
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 774 vs 481
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 vs 6 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1063 MHz vs 540 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 3,656 gflops vs 17.28 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6579 vs 108 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 774 vs 481 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 100 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6579 | 108 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 774 | 481 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27100 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8931 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8931 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2911 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Polaris 22 | G98 |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 | 6 November 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 325 | 328 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1063 MHz | 540 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,656 gflops | 17.28 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel / s | 4.32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DMS-59 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit |