AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH vs AMD Radeon Pro 580
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH and AMD Radeon Pro 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 2900
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 2900
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2018 vs 5 June 2017 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 2900 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 2900 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1063 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- Around 69% higher texture fill rate: 193.0 GTexel / s vs 114.2 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1536
- Around 69% better floating-point performance: 6,175 gflops vs 3,656 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 4.2x more memory clock speed: 6780 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7753 vs 6586
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 943 vs 779
- Around 48% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 40259 vs 27118
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10113 vs 8931
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10113 vs 8931
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1063 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 193.0 GTexel / s vs 114.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1536 |
| Floating-point performance | 6,175 gflops vs 3,656 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6780 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7753 vs 6586 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 943 vs 779 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40259 vs 27118 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10113 vs 8931 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10113 vs 8931 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 580
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH | AMD Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6586 | 7753 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 779 | 943 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27118 | 40259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8931 | 10113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 2900 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8931 | 10113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 2900 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2911 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 109.521 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1206.829 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.88 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.944 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.984 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH | AMD Radeon Pro 580 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 22 | Polaris 20 |
| Launch date | 1 February 2018 | 5 June 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 332 | 330 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1063 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 3,656 gflops | 6,175 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 2304 |
| Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel / s | 193.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB / s | 256.0 GB / s |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 6780 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH with others
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH vs
AMDRadeon HD 8990 OEM
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH vs
AMDRadeon Pro 580
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
