AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL vs AMD Radeon HD 8690M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and AMD Radeon HD 8690M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 931 MHz vs 775 MHz
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1011 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 4.9x more texture fill rate: 80.88 GTexel / s vs 16.5 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 384
- 4.9x better floating-point performance: 2,588 gflops vs 528.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3899 vs 984
- 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19455 vs 5079
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6318 vs 1579
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2070 vs 1813
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6318 vs 1579
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2070 vs 1813
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 vs 1 March 2013 |
Core clock speed | 931 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1011 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel / s vs 16.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,588 gflops vs 528.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3899 vs 984 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19455 vs 5079 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6318 vs 1579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2070 vs 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6318 vs 1579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2070 vs 1813 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8690M
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 768 vs 474
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3178 vs 1514
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3178 vs 1514
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 768 vs 474 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3178 vs 1514 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3178 vs 1514 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8690M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL | AMD Radeon HD 8690M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3899 | 984 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 474 | 768 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19455 | 5079 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.971 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1235.247 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.195 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.289 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 252.311 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6318 | 1579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2070 | 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1514 | 3178 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6318 | 1579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2070 | 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1514 | 3178 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2091 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL | AMD Radeon HD 8690M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 22 | Sun |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 | 1 March 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 629 | 626 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1011 MHz | 775 MHz |
Core clock speed | 931 MHz | 775 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,588 gflops | 528.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 80.88 GTexel / s | 16.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB / s | 32 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |