AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL vs NVIDIA Tesla M10

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and NVIDIA Tesla M10 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3675 vs 3172
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 477 vs 410
• Around 91% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19262 vs 10104
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.971 vs 46.191
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1235.247 vs 814.192
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.289 vs 50.918
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 252.311 vs 180.026
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6318 vs 5204
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6318 vs 5204

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M10

• Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 931 MHz
• Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1306 MHz vs 1011 MHz
• 5.6x more texture fill rate: 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 80.88 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 4x 640 vs 1280
• 2.6x better floating-point performance: 4x 1,672 gflops vs 2,588 gflops
• 8x more maximum memory size: 4x 8 GB vs 4 GB
• 3.7x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 1400 MHz
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3693 vs 2070
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3306 vs 1514
• Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3693 vs 2070
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3306 vs 1514

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M10

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3675 3172
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	477 410
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	19262 10104
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	58.971 46.191
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1235.247 814.192
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.289 50.918
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	252.311 180.026
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6318 5204
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2070 3693
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 3306
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6318 5204
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2070 3693
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1514 3306

Compare specifications (specs)