AMD Radeon Sky 900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Sky 900 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Sky 900

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • 292.6x more texture fill rate: 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 7.2 GTexel / s
  • 74.7x more pipelines: 3584 vs 48
  • 71.7x better floating-point performance: 2x 3,405 gflops vs 95.04 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
Launch date 27 March 2013 vs 10 January 2010
Texture fill rate 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 7.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 3584 vs 48
Floating-point performance 2x 3,405 gflops vs 95.04 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 1 GB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M

  • Around 20% higher core clock speed: 990 MHz vs 825 MHz
  • 13x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 300 Watt
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2145 vs 1654
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2145 vs 1654
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 990 MHz vs 825 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 23 Watt vs 300 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2145 vs 1654
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2145 vs 1654

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Sky 900
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1654
2145
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1654
2145
Name AMD Radeon Sky 900 NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1654 2145
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1654 2145
PassMark - G3D Mark 170
PassMark - G2D Mark 49
Geekbench - OpenCL 5606

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Sky 900 NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Tesla 2.0
Code name Tahiti GT216
Launch date 27 March 2013 10 January 2010
Place in performance rating 1544 1546
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 950 MHz
Core clock speed 825 MHz 990 MHz
Floating-point performance 2x 3,405 gflops 95.04 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 3584 48
Texture fill rate 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec 7.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 300 Watt 23 Watt
Transistor count 4,313 million 486 million
CUDA cores 48
Gigaflops 142

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort Dual Link DVIDisplayPortHDMIVGASingle Link DVI
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 3.0 PCI-E 2.0
Form factor Full Height / Full Length
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 305 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 10.1
OpenGL 4.5 2.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 480 GB / s 22.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 2x 384 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR2, GDDR3, DDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
HybridPower
Power management 8.0
SLI