AMD Radeon Sky 900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Sky 900 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Sky 900
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 292.6x more texture fill rate: 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 7.2 GTexel / s
- 74.7x more pipelines: 3584 vs 48
- 71.7x better floating-point performance: 2x 3,405 gflops vs 95.04 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
Launch date | 27 March 2013 vs 10 January 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 7.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops vs 95.04 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 990 MHz vs 825 MHz
- 13x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2145 vs 1654
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2145 vs 1654
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 990 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2145 vs 1654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2145 vs 1654 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Sky 900
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Sky 900 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1654 | 2145 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1654 | 2145 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 170 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 49 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5606 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Sky 900 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Tahiti | GT216 |
Launch date | 27 March 2013 | 10 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1550 | 1553 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 990 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 95.04 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 3584 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec | 7.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 486 million |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Gigaflops | 142 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort | Dual Link DVIDisplayPortHDMIVGASingle Link DVI |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 305 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR2, GDDR3, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
SLI |