AMD Radeon Sky 900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Sky 900 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Sky 900
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 219.4x more texture fill rate: 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 9.6 billion / sec
- 37.3x more pipelines: 3584 vs 96
- 29.6x better floating-point performance: 2x 3,405 gflops vs 230.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
- 5.6x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 900 MHz
Launch date | 27 March 2013 vs 5 January 2011 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 9.6 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops vs 230.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M
- 13x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2623 vs 1654
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2623 vs 1654
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2623 vs 1654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2623 vs 1654 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Sky 900
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Sky 900 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1654 | 2623 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1654 | 2623 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 456 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 94 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.099 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 131.334 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.355 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.733 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.015 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 911 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1338 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 911 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1338 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Sky 900 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Tahiti | GF108 |
Launch date | 27 March 2013 | 5 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1543 | 1546 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 230.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 3584 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec | 9.6 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 585 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 305 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |